Îlots résiduels post-feu

Table des matières

AVANT-PROPOS
LISTE DES FIGURES
LISTE DES TABLEAUX
LISTE DES ABRÉVIATIONS
RÉSUMÉ
CHAPITRE I INTRODUCTION GÉNÉRALE
1.1 Problématique
1.2 Intérêt d’étudier la dynamique de structure forestière
1.3 Intérêt de considérer la forêt continue comme témoin
1.4 Îlots résiduels post-feu
1.5 Îlots de rétention post-coupe
1.6 Effet de lisière
1. 7 Objectifs de la thèse
1.8 Territoire à l’étude
CHAPITRE II DEADWOOD ABUNDANCE IN POST-HARVEST AND POST-FIRE RESIDUAL PATCHES: AN EVALUATION OF PATCH TEMPORAL DYNAMICS IN BLACK SPRUCE BOREAL FOREST
2.1 Abstract
2.2 Résumé
2.3 Introduction
2.4 Material and methods
2.4.1 Study are a
2.4.2 Location of the study sites
2.4.3 Data collection
2.5 Data analyses
2.5.3 Estimation of deadwood abundance in residual patches
2.5.2 Comparison ofpost-fire residual patches versus post-harvest retention patches
2.5.3 Relationship between recent deadwood and initial stand volume
2.5.4 Factors influencing the abundance of recent deadwood in residual patches
2.6 Results
2.6.1 Abundance of deadwood after harvest and after fire
2.6.2 Effect of initial stand volume on recent deadwoodafter harvest and after fire
2.6.3 Factors influencing the abundance of recent deadwood in residual patches
2.6.4 Recent deadwood recruitment versus temporal dynamics of residual patches
2.7 Discussion
2.7.4 Factors responsible ofvariations of abundance ofpost-disturbance deadwood
2. 7.2 Recruitment dynamics of deadwood and patch temporal dynamics
2.8 Conclusions and implications for forestry and conservation biology
2.9 Acknowledgements
2.10 References
CHAPITRE III CAN RETENTION HARVEST MAINT AIN NATURAL STRUCTURAL COMPLEXITY? A COMPARISON OF POST-HARVEST AND POST-FIRE RESIDUAL PATCHES IN THE BOREAL FOREST
3.1 Abstract
3.2 Résumé
3.3 Introduction
3.4 Materials and methods
3.4.1 Study area
3.4.2 Location of the study stands
3 .4.3 Data collection
3 .4.4 Structural classification of stands
3.4.5 Description of structural types
3.4.5.1 Internai structure complexity
3.4.5.1 Forest canopy closure
3.4.6 Factors influencing stand structure
3.4.7 Structural types in post-harvest residual patches versus natural stands
3. 5 Results
3. 5.1 Structural classification of residual patch stands
3.5.2 Complexity of structural stand types
3.5.3 Influence of TSF on structure
3.5.4 Structural types: post-harvest versus post-fire residual patches
3.6 Discussion
3.7 Conclusions and silvicultural implications
3.8 Acknowledgements
3.9 Authors contributions
3.10 Conflits of interest
3.11 References
CHAPITRE IV EDGE INFLUENCE ON STRUCTURAL ATTRIBUTES IN POST-PIRE VERSUS POST-HARVEST RESIDUAL PATCHES: IMPLICATION FOR ECOSYSTEM-BASED MANAGEMENT IN BOREAL FOREST
4.1 Abstract
4.2 Résumé
4.3 Introduction
4.4 Materials and methods
4.4.1 Study area
4.4.2 Location of the study sites
4.4.3 Sampling design and data collection
4.4.4 Data analyses
4.5 Results
4.6 Discussion
4.7 Synthesis and applications
4.8 Acknowledgements
4.9 Supporting information
4.10 References
CHAPITRE V CONCLUSION GÉNÉRALE
5.1 Implications pour la gestion de la conservation des forêts
5.2 Limites et perspectives
BIBLIOGRAPHIE GÉNÉRALE